Rage Baiting in Digital Spaces: The Weaponization of Outrage

Rage baiting is not just another internet annoyance. It is a calculated strategy to hijack your attention, exploit your emotions, and feed algorithms that reward chaos over clarity. From clout chasers to ideological trolls, digital actors have discovered that outrage is the most profitable form of engagement. The more you react, the more visibility they gain and the cycle deepens. This blog unpacks the psychological manipulation, platform mechanics, and societal damage behind rage baiting. More importantly, it offers tools to break free from the trap. Because every comment you drop could be currency in someone else’s attention economy. 

The internet is not broken. It is functioning exactly as designed. What you are witnessing is not the collapse of online decency. It is the monetization of your rage. You are not scrolling through harmless noise. You are being emotionally extorted by people who have learned to feed the algorithm the one thing it can never get enough of. Controversy. Conflict. Chaos. Welcome to rage baiting.

This is not a glitch in the system. This is the system. Rage baiting is the art of provoking you on purpose. It is posting just the right amount of ignorance, cruelty, or absurdity to yank you out of your calm and into a comment section war. They do not need to make sense. They only need to make you mad. And every time you reply with a thoughtful rebuttal, every time you quote them to correct the record, every time you repost to “expose” the nonsense, you become a co-producer of the viral spiral. Congratulations. You just did their job for them.

Outrage is addictive. Outrage is contagious. And most importantly, outrage is visible. Social media platforms are engineered to amplify content that generates engagement. Not truth. Not context. Not healing. Engagement. And nothing engages quite like anger. The more upset you get, the more attention a post receives. The more attention it receives, the more it is shown. The more it is shown, the more the rage spreads. This is not social media. This is a factory that runs on your fury and pays its rent with your reactions.

But do not get it twisted. Rage baiting is not always clumsy or obvious. It wears many faces. Sometimes it looks like satire that punches down. Sometimes it sounds like a bold opinion masked as “just asking questions.” Sometimes it masquerades as moral panic or political commentary. And sometimes it is pure trolling; calculated, hollow, and entirely disinterested in truth. The goal is always the same. To go viral on the back of your emotional labor.

The worst part is how predictable it has become. They know your triggers. They study your timelines. They track your outrage patterns like vultures circling a carcass. And you, noble warrior of the internet, keep taking the bait like it is a badge of honor. This is not discourse. This is performance. And rage baiting is the headliner.

So the next time something enrages you online, pause. You might not be the audience. You might be the product.

The Psychology Behind Rage Baiting

There is a silent addiction pulsing through digital spaces. It is not caffeine, it is not pornography, it is not even dopamine. It is outrage. Rage baiting thrives not because humanity has become more cruel, but because the human brain remains deeply predictable. Negativity captures us faster than nuance, and rage travels farther than reason. The internet did not create this flaw. It merely learned to monetize it.

Psychologists have long established that human cognition is wired to prioritize threat over comfort. This is known as negativity bias, and it is not a bug in the system. It is an evolutionary feature. Rozin and Royzman revealed that negative information holds greater psychological weight than positive information across memory, attention, and emotion (Rozin and Royzman 296). Your brain is not interested in serenity. It is programmed to detect danger. That is why you barely register compliments but replay insults like rituals. Rage baiters exploit this design. They construct content calibrated to trigger the primitive alarms in your brain that scream, “This is an attack.”

You do not engage because you care. You engage because you are provoked. And in the digital world, provocation is performance. Rage baiters craft statements that offend sensibilities, distort logic, and mock entire groups; not to win debates, but to hijack timelines. They do not seek understanding. They seek reaction. They do not care if you agree or disagree. They care that you do not scroll past. Your outrage is their oxygen. Your comment, your quote, your share, those are algorithmic endorsements. You believe you are resisting. In truth, you are advertising.

What makes rage baiting insidious is its subtle manipulation of identity. These posts often target the very things people feel most protective of race, gender, religion, intelligence, morality. When someone attacks your core values, your response is rarely logical. It is defensive. It is impulsive. It is emotional. And that is exactly what rage baiters want. Emotion equals engagement. Engagement equals exposure. Exposure equals power.

Moreover, the platform architecture is complicit. Social media platforms elevate content that keeps users on the app longer. Rage increases watch time. Rage multiplies comments. Rage creates loyalty, not to truth, but to conflict. Research shows that emotionally charged content, particularly anger-inducing content, spreads significantly more than neutral or informative content (Brady et al. 13709). The system is not broken. The system is functioning as designed.

Rage baiters are not thought leaders. They are emotional engineers. They reverse-engineer controversy by studying what enrages the most people with the fewest words. Often, they masquerade as naïve questioners or edgy comedians. Sometimes, they hide behind pseudo-intellectual jargon. But the formula is always the same. Trigger emotion. Capture attention. Exploit the algorithm. Repeat.

And you, the consumer of content, become the unpaid distributor. You screenshot their post to expose it. You write a thread to correct it. You make a video to counter it. But in doing so, you amplify it. Your good intentions become fuel for their digital wildfire. As Phillips writes, “Moral outrage online does not simply express dissent. It also reproduces the very structures it seeks to disrupt” (Phillips 122).

If there is a war happening online, it is not one of ideas. It is a war for your attention. Rage baiting wins not by defeating your logic, but by bypassing it entirely. It goes straight to your amygdala, skips your prefrontal cortex, and pulls your thumbs into action. And in that moment, you are no longer a thinker. You are a tool. A very passionate, very reactive tool.

To resist rage baiting is to reclaim your ability to pause. To recognize when your anger is being harvested. To understand that not every provocation deserves a podium. Because sometimes the most powerful response is not a quote tweet. It is silence.

The Algorithm Feeds Off Outrage

Algorithms do not understand morality. They do not care about context. They do not distinguish between love and hate. They see only one thing. Engagement. And in the attention economy, nothing engages faster, louder, or more reliably than rage.

Social media platforms were not designed to elevate truth. They were engineered to keep you scrolling. Every second you stay is a data point. Every click is a product. And your emotions are the fuel. This is not a coincidence. This is capitalism in code. If you want to understand why rage baiting thrives, you must understand the machine it feeds.

On platforms like X, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook, algorithmic systems are built to reward visibility based on interaction. A post that gets liked, shared, commented on, or quoted gains algorithmic favor. It is pushed to more people. It grows. It multiplies. It invades feeds. And it does not matter if the interaction is positive or negative. The algorithm cannot tell the difference between applause and disgust. All it sees is velocity. Rage travels fast, and that makes it valuable.

This is why rage baiters succeed. They do not need you to agree. They need you to react. When you comment in fury, when you repost in protest, when you make a video in rebuttal, you are boosting their content. The algorithm reads your outrage as popularity. As relevance. As demand. Your resistance becomes a recommendation.

A 2021 study from MIT confirmed that false and inflammatory content spreads significantly more than factual content on platforms like Twitter. This is not because lies are more interesting. It is because outrage is more shareable. The researchers found that falsehoods reached more people, penetrated deeper into networks, and did so faster than the truth. The viral engine is oiled by provocation, not accuracy (Vosoughi et al. 1146).

This system is not only broken. It is broken in the direction of harm. Algorithms are incentivized to reward extremity. Moderate voices vanish in the noise. Rational discourse gets buried beneath emotional spectacle. Posts that insult, generalize, attack, or mock are promoted because they activate engagement. Engagement is the currency. Rage is the shortcut to wealth.

Creators have figured this out. And now entire business models revolve around triggering the algorithm through outrage. Some use politics. Some use gender wars. Some use race, religion, parenting, mental health, or trauma. It does not matter what they use. What matters is how many people they can anger fast. The rage becomes a funnel. The funnel becomes a following. The following becomes monetization.

YouTube recommends controversial videos to users who have never searched for them. Facebook radicalizes news feeds based on emotional triggers. TikTok pushes contentious content because it drives comments and watch time. These are not platforms. They are outrage casinos, and the house always wins.

What makes this machine so grotesque is that it learns. Every time you take the bait, it records your reaction. It updates its model. It predicts what will provoke you next. You are training the system that manipulates you. You are the teacher and the victim. The algorithm grows sharper with your every complaint.

And no, this is not the result of a few bad developers. This is the outcome of a business model that prioritizes attention above all else. The angrier you are, the longer you stay. The longer you stay, the more ads you see. The more ads you see, the more profitable the platform becomes. Your outrage is not an accident. It is inventory.

Rage baiting works because the algorithm is not your friend. It is not a neutral tool. It is a mirror that reflects your worst impulses and magnifies them until they pay dividends. The system does not ask if something is good. It asks if something is sticky. Outrage sticks. Outrage spreads. And in the end, the only thing that matters is the metric.

Who Rage Baits and Why

Rage baiting is not an accident. It is a career path. It is a tactic. It is a business model disguised as personality. It is the performance of provocation for public consumption. And behind every inflammatory post, every thread that smells like a dumpster fire wrapped in WiFi, there is someone who knows exactly what they are doing.

Not all rage baiters are created equal. But they all speak the same language. Controversy. They manufacture it. Package it. Monetize it. And while you are sweating through a ten-paragraph response that no one will read, they are refreshing their notifications and watching their numbers climb.

The first and most obvious type is the clout chaser. These are the digital bottom feeders who will say anything to go viral. They do not care if it is true. They do not care if it is harmful. They only care if it trends. They thrive on hot takes with zero substance and zero shame. One day they are experts on vaccines. The next day they are economists. Then suddenly they are relationship gurus. They are allergic to consistency because consistency does not drive engagement. Their loyalty is to reach, not reality.

Next comes the troll. The classic rage baiter. Trolls do not want followers. They want explosions. They are arsonists in comment sections. They feed on your fury like oxygen. They are not confused. They are not ignorant. They are entertained. Trolls perform ignorance the way actors perform grief. They will bait you with blatant falsehoods just to enjoy your meltdown. They are digital sadists, and your outrage is their dopamine (Buckels et al. 98).

Then there is the influencer class. These are the pseudo-experts who hide their rage baiting inside branded aesthetics. They often present as self-help coaches, edgy commentators, or contrarian intellectuals. Their content walks the line between opinion and offense, and they know exactly how far to push. They are not trying to get banned. They are trying to get famous. They build entire audiences off the back of polarizing content, and when the backlash comes, they claim they are being silenced. In reality, the backlash is their marketing strategy.

Politicians are perhaps the most dangerous rage baiters. They weaponize outrage at scale. Their content is not just attention-seeking. It is agenda-driven. They create enemies out of thin air. They amplify culture wars. They say things that divide on purpose. Why? Because a divided public is easier to control. It is easier to fundraise when your followers feel threatened. It is easier to campaign when your base is angry. Outrage becomes a political asset. As Marwick and Lewis note, “The deployment of outrage and fear is not just a side effect. It is a central component of digital political strategy” (Marwick and Lewis 15).

There is also the rage baiter who does not even believe what they say. They post provocative opinions not because they hold them, but because those opinions perform well. They treat beliefs like outfits. Disposable. Trend-based. If the metrics say misogyny works, they will wear misogyny. If the metrics say moral panic works, they will peddle panic. They are not ideologues. They are opportunists. Their loyalty is to engagement, not ethics.

Even brands have learned to rage bait. Companies post intentionally divisive content to spark debates and go viral. They pretend to be bold. In truth, they are bored with invisibility. Controversy is cheaper than advertising. A well-placed tweet can earn more impressions than a billboard. And nobody gets fired for raising the numbers.

This is the anatomy of a rage baiter. They do not need to be smart. They need to be strategic. They do not need facts. They need friction. They do not need substance. They need spectacle. And you, the viewer, the commenter, the unwilling co-signer, are often the one paying for their visibility with your emotional labor.

The motive behind rage baiting is not always hate. Sometimes it is desperation. Sometimes it is narcissism. Sometimes it is calculated exploitation of your attention span. But make no mistake. Every rage baiter, whether troll or politician, is playing the same game. They are betting that you cannot look away. They are betting that you will take the bait.

And most days, they are right.

Real-World Consequences

Rage baiting is not just a game. It is not just annoying content cluttering your feed. It is not just trolls being trolls or influencers being extra. It is a public health hazard. A digital cancer. A social accelerant setting fire to the very platforms pretending to host civil discourse. While users engage in comment section duels, the world around them fractures.

The first and most visible cost is misinformation. Rage baiting thrives on it. Not just because lies are easier to spin than truth, but because emotionally charged misinformation spreads more rapidly than facts. Vosoughi et al. showed that falsehoods are seventy percent more likely to be retweeted than the truth and reach people six times faster (1146). Rage baiters exploit this speed. They craft distortions that target emotions and evade logic. Once a lie goes viral, a correction becomes a whisper against a hurricane. Even when debunked, the misinformation lingers, reshaped into conspiracy, weaponized into distrust.

This climate of constant outrage also fuels harassment. Rage baiters often direct their followers toward individuals or communities. What begins as a provocative post turns into digital mob violence. Dogpiling, doxxing, threats, and reputational damage become normalized responses. Victims are not abstract ideas. They are real people with inboxes filled with death threats. They are teenagers pushed into anxiety. They are public figures retreating from visibility. They are marginalized voices silenced not by argument, but by exhaustion. Jane Lytvynenko documented how targeted disinformation campaigns and rage amplification have turned harassment into a strategic tool of online influence (Lytvynenko 3).

The long-term psychological damage is staggering. Exposure to continuous online outrage correlates with increased stress, anxiety, and emotional dysregulation. People begin to fear speaking out. They censor themselves. They disengage from civic conversations. This is not just silencing. It is erosion. Rage baiting turns every online interaction into a potential threat. It reduces public discourse to a gladiator arena, where survival depends on emotional detachment or blind conformity.

And then comes the worst consequence of all. Polarization. Rage baiting pulls communities apart by design. It positions every disagreement as a war. Every post becomes a loyalty test. Every opinion becomes a litmus for tribal identity. Nuance dies. Empathy disappears. The middle ground is swallowed whole by algorithmic extremism. The more we argue, the more divided we become. The more divided we become, the more vulnerable we are to manipulation. This is not discourse. It is disintegration.

Even offline, rage baiting spills into real consequences. Elections are swayed by outrage. Public health is sabotaged by disinformation. Relationships are broken over politicized content. Hate crimes spike following viral misinformation campaigns. Children absorb toxic narratives as entertainment. Rage baiting is not staying in its lane. It is leaking. Into classrooms. Into boardrooms. Into families.

What is most damning is how normalized it has become. Platforms excuse it under the banner of free speech. Users dismiss it as trolling. Brands leverage it for engagement. Politicians disguise it as patriotism. And while society plays semantics, the damage compounds. The silence of those who see the manipulation but do nothing becomes its own form of complicity. The machine keeps spinning. The comments keep rolling. The targets keep bleeding.

Rage baiting is not a content strategy. It is a cultural sickness. It poisons not only the timelines it infects but the people who inhabit them. And unlike the viruses we treat with vaccines, this one thrives on attention. It grows every time you click, every time you quote, every time you share something you claim to hate.

It is not enough to dislike rage baiting. It must be recognized as the coordinated psychological warfare that it is. Because while you are arguing in good faith, someone else is monetizing your misery.

How to Disarm a Rage Baiter

You cannot reason with a rage baiter. You cannot outsmart them in the comments. You cannot defeat them by writing the perfect rebuttal. Because the goal was never to win the argument. The goal was to start it. To make you feel. To make you type. To make you react. Engagement is the only scoreboard, and outrage is their winning move.

So what do you do when you see them coming? You do what their ego cannot survive. You ignore them. You starve them. You let their provocation rot in its own irrelevance. Because to engage is to feed. To feed is to fuel. And to fuel is to lose.

Start with the most radical act of resistance. Do not comment. Not even to correct. Not even to clarify. Not even to express your horror. Every keystroke is a signal to the algorithm that the post is working. That it deserves more reach. That it is valuable. Even comments filled with righteous anger function as fertilizer. The algorithm does not care if your intention is noble. It only sees numbers. And numbers speak louder than ethics.

If the content is genuinely harmful, report it. Most platforms have systems in place to flag abusive or manipulative behavior. Use them. Block the source. Mute the thread. Remove yourself from the loop of provocation. Because silence is not complicity when the other side is baiting you for profit. Silence is strategy.

Another tactic is to call out the pattern, not the bait. Instead of responding to what the rage baiter says, point out that they are rage baiting. Expose the playbook. Explain the algorithmic incentives. Make the manipulation visible. Disempower their performance by breaking the fourth wall. As Tufekci explains, “The architecture of attention online rewards manipulation. Calling out the manipulation itself is a step toward collective resistance” (Tufekci 12).

Educate your audience. Not every battle has to be fought in the comments. Sometimes the smartest move is to make your own post. Share how rage baiting works. Deconstruct viral posts without linking to them. Teach people the economics of engagement. Awareness is one of the few antidotes to viral manipulation. When people learn the trick, the magician loses power.

Curate your feed with intention. Unfollow rage merchants. Unsubscribe from digital dramatists. Block accounts that manufacture conflict. You are not obligated to witness emotional violence because someone dressed it up as content. Protect your mental bandwidth like it is sacred. Because it is. Rage baiting feeds off your attention. Withdraw it, and you starve the ecosystem.

If you are a creator, take responsibility. Refuse to engage in reactionary posting just to grow numbers. Refuse to stitch nonsense for clout. Refuse to quote ignorance to make your own point. Because every time you engage publicly with a rage baiter, you put them on stage. You signal boost their content. And you drag your audience into the spectacle.

Most importantly, recognize the temptation in yourself. Rage baiting works because it is not just a tactic. It is a trap. Even intelligent people fall for it. Even emotionally mature people want to respond when provoked. But mastery begins with the pause. The ability to feel the heat rise in your chest and choose stillness. To see a bad take go viral and say nothing. To watch chaos unfold and know that silence can be resistance.

There is no moral victory in engaging a rage baiter. There is only emotional taxation. Your anger will not convert them. Your facts will not impress them. Your rebuttal will not humble them. But your indifference might unnerve them. Your silence might starve them. Your refusal to play might shrink their reach.

This is not disengagement. This is disruption. This is strategy. This is what it looks like to walk away from a digital fire without adding oxygen. Because sometimes the most powerful thing you can do is nothing.

In conclusion,

If You Feed It, It Feeds You

Rage baiting is not a bug in the system. It is the system. It is not the occasional troll under the bridge. It is the bridge. And we are the ones marching over it every single day, hypnotized by our own emotional triggers, addicted to reaction, and rewarded for performative indignation. The problem is not just out there. It is also within us. Because in the world of digital warfare, outrage is not only weaponized by others. It is self-sustaining.

The internet was supposed to democratize information. Instead, it democratized provocation. Anyone with a smartphone can now launch an emotional missile into your consciousness. A viral post. A stitched video. A deliberately misworded tweet. And while you are busy defending your values in the comments section, someone else is cashing in on your attention. It is not a dialogue. It is not a debate. It is a business model. And it profits every time you take the bait.

In ancient warfare, generals used decoys to draw enemies into traps. Rage baiting is the digital version of that strategy. But instead of arrows and cavalry, it uses emojis and quotes. Instead of terrain, it uses timelines. Instead of blood, it spills cortisol. And the casualties are mental health, public discourse, and the basic ability to think slowly in a fast-paced world.

This is the era of synthetic emotional manipulation. Social media platforms have turned your outrage into a resource. Every time you feel violated enough to speak, you raise the post’s stock. Every time you respond to something foolish, you reward the algorithm’s choice. Every time you shout into the void, you build the echo chamber higher. The platforms are not broken. They are working exactly as designed.

Studies have confirmed that negative emotions such as anger and fear are more contagious than joy or calmness in online environments (Brady et al. 1146). And yet we act surprised when hate goes viral faster than hope. When tribalism wins over nuance. When the loudest fool drowns out the quiet thinker. Rage baiting is not effective because people are stupid. It is effective because people are human. And humans crave validation, belonging, and power. Rage offers all three in the cheapest form possible.

What happens when entire generations are trained to think in outrage first and reflect later? When algorithms become cultural editors? When influencers become provocateurs and dissent becomes performance? You get exactly what we have today. A digital Wild West where being offensive is a growth strategy. Where misinformation is camouflaged in sarcasm. Where disagreement is monetized like a reality show.

But here is the brutal truth. Rage baiting does not survive on its own. It requires participants. It requires believers. It requires amplifiers. And every single time you rage comment, you become one. The real question is not who is rage baiting you. It is who you are rage baiting for.

There is a reason why your feed feels like a battlefield. Social platforms are not neutral spaces. They are psychological machines built to optimize your engagement. They want you to keep scrolling. Keep clicking. Keep responding. Not because it makes you smarter. Not because it makes you more informed. But because it makes someone money. Rage baiting is not just tolerated. It is engineered.

You cannot reform what you refuse to recognize. It is time to call it what it is. A system of emotional exploitation. A casino of attention where everyone is betting with their sanity. A ritual of digital violence where the likes are weapons and the shares are grenades. The people benefiting from your outrage are not the ones you are arguing with. They are the ones watching you burn from above.

So what is the way out?

First, stop performing. Stop acting like your every response is a moral crusade. Most of what happens online is theater. And most of your audience does not care who wins the argument. They care who entertained them. Rage baiting only thrives in performative ecosystems. Once you stop playing the part, the script collapses.

Second, think before you share. Before you amplify any post, ask yourself one question. Is this helping someone learn or helping someone earn? The line between activism and algorithmic bait is razor thin. Do not become a pawn in someone else’s content strategy.

Third, reclaim your boredom. The absence of digital stimulation is not a threat. It is a reset. Rage baiters depend on your compulsion to constantly refresh. Break the cycle. Go silent. Go offline. Go touch reality before reality forgets how you sound.

Fourth, remember that not every battle is worthy. Some posts are not invitations. They are traps. And wisdom is knowing when to let fools talk to themselves. You are not obligated to respond just because you can. Silence is not always weakness. Sometimes it is refusal. And refusal is revolutionary.

Fifth, if you create content, take a side. Be honest about what you are doing. Are you educating or exploiting? Are you provoking for insight or provoking for profit? The difference matters. The internet does not need more critics. It needs creators who refuse to build their platforms on manipulation.

Lastly, invest in your own discernment. Learn the psychological triggers that make you susceptible. Study the architecture of digital rage. Understand the neuroscience of emotional hijacking. Because self-awareness is the only antidote to manipulation. You cannot out-algorithm the system. But you can outthink it.

In the end, rage baiting is not just a technological phenomenon. It is a moral one. It is a test of our emotional literacy. A referendum on our collective maturity. And right now, we are failing. But failure is not destiny. It is a warning.

We do not need a new platform. We need a new posture. A new ethic of interaction. A refusal to be used. A commitment to being unbothered not because we are indifferent, but because we are strategic. The revolution will not be screamed. It will be silent. It will be intentional. It will begin the moment we stop handing our enemies the microphone.

Because in the theater of rage, the only way to win is not to perform.

Works Cited

Brady, William J., et al. “Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 28, 2017, pp. 7313–7318. National Academy of Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114.

Cinelli, Matteo, et al. “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 9, 2021, e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118.

Frijda, Nico H. “The Laws of Emotion.” American Psychologist, vol. 43, no. 5, 1988, pp. 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349.

Guess, Andrew, et al. “Exposure to Untrustworthy Websites in the 2016 U.S. Election.” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 4, 2020, pp. 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x.

Marwick, Alice E., and Rebecca Lewis. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. Data & Society Research Institute, 2017, https://datasociety.net/library/media-manipulation-and-disinformation-online/.

Phillips, Whitney, and Ryan M. Milner. You Are Here: A Field Guide for Navigating Polarized Speech, Conspiracy Theories, and Our Polluted Media Landscape. MIT Press, 2021.

Rozin, Paul, and Edward B. Royzman. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 5, no. 4, 2001, pp. 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.

Tufekci, Zeynep. “Algorithmic Harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency.” Colorado Technology Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, 2015, pp. 203–218. https://ctlj.colorado.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Tufekci-final.pdf.

Vosoughi, Soroush, et al. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, 2018, pp. 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.

Wells, Chris. “How We Became a Post-Truth Society.” The Atlantic, 2020, https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/08/how-social-media-warps-truth/615517/.