Maintaining peaceful relations with your immediate neighbours remains the wisest and most beneficial option so far.

In a world where stress and noise often come from every corner, finding peace starts right at your doorstep. Building mutual respect, sharing smiles, and embracing simple kindness with the people next door can turn an ordinary street into a warm, welcoming community. Whether it's borrowing sugar, watching each other's homes, or just a friendly wave each morning, these small gestures go a long way. Harmony with neighbours brings safety, laughter, and a sense of belonging. After all, when your immediate environment is at peace, everything else becomes a little easier to handle. Good neighbours truly make great days.

There is something quietly powerful about living in peace with the people around you. Your immediate neighbours are not just random individuals who happen to live nearby. They are part of the same daily rhythm, the same shared space, the same unseen network that affects your quality of life more than you might realize. Choosing to live in harmony with them is not just polite, it is practical. It is not weakness, but wisdom. It is not about perfection, but patience. And in today’s fast-moving world, that choice is proving to be one of the most rewarding and grounding decisions you can make.

Imagine waking up every day knowing that the people who live next to you respect your space, your peace, and your presence. Picture a neighbourhood where children play freely, where a knock on the door is often followed by a friendly chat, where small disagreements are resolved with conversation instead of conflict. That kind of environment is not a luxury. It is possible, and it begins with intention. It begins with small actions that show you care. A warm hello. A helping hand. A shared smile over the fence.

Living in harmony does not mean you must be best friends with your neighbours. It simply means treating each other with kindness, empathy, and a touch of grace. It means being aware that your music, your lights, your movements, and your habits ripple outward. It means understanding that every home in a neighbourhood is connected not by walls but by energy. And when that energy is positive, life flows more easily for everyone.

When neighbours live in constant tension, the atmosphere becomes heavy. It affects sleep. It drains joy. It breeds suspicion. On the other hand, when people make the effort to build understanding, to speak when something is wrong, and to celebrate when something is right, the entire neighbourhood benefits. Safety improves. Support systems form naturally. People start looking out for each other without being asked. That is community. That is harmony in action.

No one gets to choose their neighbours, but everyone gets to choose how to live with them. You can be the one who brings light into your street, who plants peace instead of drama, who leads by example. It does not take much. Just presence. Just respect. Just love in its simplest form.

So if you are wondering what your next best step could be, start at your gate. Smile at your neighbour. The peace you plant there will grow far beyond the fence.

Peace Begins at Home: The Psychological and Social Value of Neighborly Harmony

In an age marked by digital disconnection, rising mental health challenges, and global instability, the idea that peace begins at home is more than a quaint maxim. It is a data-driven imperative. Living in harmony with one’s immediate neighbors is not only beneficial. It is essential to the psychological, emotional, and social well-being of individuals and communities alike. Across disciplines, recent scholarship confirms that neighborhood cohesion contributes significantly to lower stress levels, better mental health outcomes, and improved collective resilience. These findings suggest that the simple act of fostering peaceful relationships within one's immediate environment is both a civic and psychological good.

Research since 2020 has emphasized the profound relationship between neighborhood social cohesion and mental health. According to Breedvelt et al., adolescents and young adults who report higher levels of neighborhood trust, safety, and reciprocity also experience significantly lower levels of depression and anxiety (Breedvelt et al. 8). This protective effect is not limited to youth. In a study conducted in Germany, perceived cohesion among neighbors fully mediated the connection between the built environment and mental well-being, meaning that the physical attributes of a neighborhood were only as beneficial as the social ties that flourished within them (Prati 13).

This growing body of evidence illustrates that social proximity can often outweigh economic status or individual coping strategies when it comes to resilience. Linde et al. have shown that even in economically marginalized communities, strong neighborhood bonds correlate with fewer psychological distress symptoms, higher life satisfaction, and a greater sense of safety (Linde et al. 236). This challenges the prevailing assumption that mental health is a purely private or clinical matter and reframes it as a communal concern shaped by environmental and relational factors.

The benefits of neighborhood harmony extend beyond mental health. Cohesive communities are also safer and more civically engaged. According to Sampson, collective efficacy, defined as the shared willingness of residents to intervene for the common good, flourishes where mutual respect and informal social control exist. In such environments, crime rates decrease and perceptions of public safety increase, resulting in a virtuous cycle that reinforces communal well-being (Sampson 108).

Nature also plays a role in reinforcing neighborly peace. A study by the Urban Mind project found that everyday exposure to green spaces and birdsong within residential areas significantly lowers rates of depression and loneliness (Mechelli). However, the psychological benefit of these natural features increases dramatically when shared through social interaction. A public park is not merely a visual asset; it is a communal space that invites connection and mutual presence.

Given this overwhelming evidence, it is surprising how often society undervalues the neighbor. Public discourse focuses heavily on national politics, economic crises, or international conflict, while ignoring the person next door. Yet, it is precisely this neglect that erodes communal bonds and breeds suspicion. A neighborhood in which greetings are rare, fences are high, and disputes are settled with silence becomes a fertile ground for anxiety, fear, and emotional alienation.

To reverse this trajectory, intentional investments must be made, investments not necessarily in concrete but in culture. Social prescribing models, now gaining traction in the United Kingdom and parts of Canada, refer individuals to local clubs, gardening groups, and volunteer activities as part of mental health treatment. These programs recognize that sometimes the best medicine is not found in a bottle but in a warm conversation over a shared hedge.

In conclusion, the evidence is unambiguous. Peace does not begin in government halls or international summits. It begins at the doorstep, in the smile to a neighbor, in the offer to help, and in the choice to belong. If we are serious about improving collective well-being, then we must treat neighborly harmony not as a nicety, but as a necessity.

Kindness Is Contagious: The Mental Health and Social Benefits of Neighborly Generosity

In any functioning neighborhood small acts of kindness ripple outward and create a broader sense of connection and well being. Evidence from recent research shows that simple acts of generosity toward neighbors reduce loneliness improve mental health and strengthen social cohesion. This research indicates that kindness is not only beneficial to individual well being but also spreads through communities enhancing social networks in measurable ways.

A large international randomized controlled trial called the KIND Challenge assigned over four thousand participants in the United States the United Kingdom and Australia to perform at least one act of kindness per week for four weeks. Participants reported significantly reduced loneliness social isolation social anxiety and stress and experienced improved relations with neighbors (Nextdoor and Holt‑Lunstad et al.) (“The KIND Challenge” Abstract). The effects persisted even with minimal intervention intensity confirming that small gestures can yield meaningful benefits for people’s psychological and social health in both North America and Europe.

Subsequent analysis from related trials underscores that acts of kindness are uniquely valuable beyond general social interaction. A comparative intervention involving cognitive behavioral therapy social activity and kindness tasks found that kindness participants had greater improvements in social connection and life satisfaction than even those receiving formal therapy (Reddit summary) (u/fchung) (Reddit summary). That finding suggests that benevolent behavior directed toward others may foster positive social identity purpose and reciprocal contact more effectively than solitary reflection or casual leisure.

Moreover kindness appears to spread through social networks even to individuals who were neither the giver nor the direct recipient. Christakis and Fowler’s social contagion theory supported by recent empirical work shows that prosocial behavior cascades up to two or three degrees of separation (“Three degrees of influence”). That contagion effect means when one person performs an act of kindness a neighbor who does not directly receive it may nevertheless feel inspired to act similarly enriching the social climate of the third person down the chain.

A controlled experiment conducted by UCLA’s Bedari Kindness Institute demonstrated the emotional uplift and charitable behavior triggered by witnessing kindness. Participants who viewed a video depicting acts of generosity gave twenty five percent more to charity than those who saw a neutral video. Their willingness to donate increased and their mood improved, reflecting an emotional elevation that activates pro social impulses (Wolf). Within neighborhoods acts of kindness therefore do more than benefit the direct recipient they create visible signals of goodwill that invite others to follow.

Observational data from blood donation studies in the Netherlands echo the contagion phenomenon. Neighbors are more likely to donate when others in their vicinity do so. This effect emerges from social influence and modeling rather than obligation or incentive structures (“Neighbourhood social contagion”). That pattern reinforces how neighborly generosity can become a self sustaining force within a community.

Together these lines of evidence support a powerful thesis. Kindness directed at neighbors creates immediate psychological benefits for both giver and receiver and catalyses social contagion affecting entire communities. Regularly greeting neighbors offering help or engaging in small supportive gestures builds trust belonging and reduces emotional suffering.

Therefore public health and community planners would benefit from promoting neighborly kindness as a low cost high impact intervention. Encouraging residents to commit to weekly acts of kindness or hosting local kindness challenges could decrease loneliness improve mental health and foster community resilience. These strategies are particularly compelling because they require minimal resources yet have scalable effects.

In conclusion kindness truly is contagious. When neighbors make small gestures of care and support they not only elevate their own mood they also catalyze social change. The act of helping another person can ripple across networks fostering viral-like patterns of prosocial behavior. Living in harmony with neighbors thus becomes more than polite courtesy it becomes a public health strategy grounded in scientific evidence and reinforced by social contagion. Small acts of kindness can ultimately help entire communities flourish.

Harmony Builds Security: Collective Efficacy, Social Cohesion, and Neighborhood Safety

In contemporary discourse the notion of neighborhood harmony is often framed as a sentimental ideal. Yet recent empirical evidence demonstrates that harmonious relations among neighbors produce measurable safety gains and mental health benefits for individuals and communities. Collective efficacy defined as mutual trust and the willingness of residents to intervene for the common good operates as a powerful protective factor reducing crime and enhancing well being across diverse settings. Living in harmony with immediate neighbors thus becomes not only polite but also prudent.

Research published in the past five years underscores the power of collective efficacy. A longitudinal study conducted in Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing project showed that high levels of collective efficacy during childhood buffer against both internalizing problems like anxiety and externalizing behavior problems during adolescence (Riina et al. 2014; Ott et al. 2023) suggesting that a cohesive community environment can mitigate risks associated with family adversity (Community collective efficacy study) ([turn0search5]).

Additional studies reveal that neighborhoods characterized by strong social cohesion and informal social control report lower rates of violent and property crime. Collective efficacy fosters communal monitoring and mutual support so that deviant or threatening behavior is less likely to escalate into violence (Collective efficacy definition) ([turn0search22]). Recent time variant analyses confirm that increases in collective efficacy within urban neighborhoods correspond to decreases in household robbery and assault rates over time particularly among adolescents (Collective efficacy time‑variant analyses) ([turn0search1]).

Community safety research further shows that perceived cohesion among neighbors helps buffer the adverse effects of environmental stressors including crime exposure. Residents who believe that they can rely on neighbors and expect collective norms report greater feelings of safety and fewer mental health symptoms even when crime rates are elevated (Perceived cohesion buffer) ([turn0search10]; Contextualizing crime stressor) ([turn0search2]).

The presence of tangible neighborhood amenities such as parks community centers and well maintained streets also supports cohesion and safety goals. Designs that encourage communal gathering and routine interaction boost informal guardianship and reduce fear of victimization (Crime prevention environmental design) ([turn0search9]). Observational longitudinal data from retirees in New Zealand demonstrate that neighborhood safety and cohesion predict increased social engagement which in turn mediates better mental health and reduced loneliness over six years (Older adults cohesion study) ([turn0search0]).

The link between cohesion safety and mental health is not incidental. A meta‑analysis of neighborhood crime exposure finds significant associations between both objective and perceived crime and increased depressogenic symptoms anxiety and psychosis risk (Neighborhood crime mental health impact) ([turn0search17]). Neighborhood cohesion operates as a protective shield reducing these negative outcomes by promoting trust and mutual responsiveness (Social cohesion mental health) ([turn0search13]; Social cohesion inequality) ([turn0search7]).

Effective community crime prevention programs leverage these principles. Initiatives such as Communities That Care utilize neighborhood coalitions youth mentoring safe public spaces and civic engagement to reduce youth delinquency and violence (Community crime prevention system) ([turn0search24]). These public health models function not by relying on punitive enforcement but by reinforcing social infrastructure and public trust.

In the United States recent federal strategies reflect these insights. Analysis of post COVID crime declines shows that policies combining mental health access substance treatment and community violence intervention funded through federal acts resulted in substantial reductions in violent and property crimes especially in high risk neighborhoods (Declining crime news) ([turn0news19]; Policy critique) ([turn0news21]).

Thus neighborhood harmony built on social cohesion and collective efficacy yields measurable security dividends. When residents trust one another care about shared spaces and intervene informally to uphold norms the results are lower crime rates fewer mental health burdens and greater life satisfaction. Safety becomes emergent from everyday acts of respect and mutual responsibility.

In conclusion harmony does more than soothe social relations. It builds security. The evidence demonstrates that when neighbors connect trust each other and look out for community norms not only is violence deterred but mental distress declines. Harmony constitutes public safety infrastructure. Living in harmony with immediate neighbors therefore aligns ethical courtesy with empirical wisdom and contributes tangibly to communal resilience.

You Do Not Have to Be Best Friends: The Virtue of Respectful Neighbor Distance

In mature societies neighbor relations are quintessential examples of how proximity does not require intimacy. One can trust and respect a neighbor without cultivating deep friendship. Recent scholarship emphasizes that respectful distance combined with occasional civility is both protective and psychologically sustainable. One need not forge personal bonds to derive the communal benefits of mutual trust reciprocity and safety.

Hannu Ruonavaara in his theoretical framework on neighbor relations demonstrates that neighbourly ties often function as weak acquaintance forms rather than robust friendships (Ruonavaara). These interactions are adequate to preserve social cohesion while recognizing individual privacy boundaries. Recognizing different levels of neighbor interactions allows residents to maintain personal autonomy without sacrificing communal trust.

Providing empirical weight to this thesis Gallup researchers report that greeting up to six neighbors regularly improves subjective well being across career social community financial and physical domains even when deeper relations are absent (Bayne and Witters). These findings suggest that mere daily civility enhances life satisfaction. The quality of neighbor contact matters less than the consistent practice of polite acknowledgment.

Likewise trust in neighbors correlates strongly with positive health outcomes even where familiarity remains limited. A global study established that trusting neighbors predicts better mental health in contexts across the Global North and South (In Neighbors We Trust). Notably these outcomes emerge from generalized trust rather than intimate knowledge. Trust need not require friendship to generate benefits.

Privacy remains an important concern in neighbor relations. A systematic review of housing privacy highlights the need for social distance even within dense settings (Elali). This research underscores how residents value psychological and territorial privacy even as they share close physical space. It reinforces the principle that neighborly harmony does not demand personal disclosure or emotional indebtedness.

During the COVID‐19 pandemic high rise communities in Hong Kong provided a natural experiment in respect within proximity. Despite increased anti social behaviors residents with a stronger sense of community reported fewer conflicts and greater tolerance (Enjoying Your Neighbourhood). This dynamic illustrates that respectful distance allows conflict management without emotional intimacy. Social cohesion emerges from mutual expectations rather than personal friendship.

This balanced approach to neighbor relations also supports family well being. McDonell and Sianko observe that neighborly civility improves child safety and family functioning even when neighbor interactions remain formal (McDonell and Sianko). Familial households benefit from a stable environment shaped by respectful boundaries and occasional support rather than deep personal ties.

These academic insights indicate clear implications for community design and policy. Municipal planners should foster opportunities for casual neighbor engagement such as shared walkways community meetings and neighborhood events. These structures allow residents to greet each other exchange courtesies and share public spaces without imposing emotional closeness. Brief cordiality promotes collective efficacy and resilience without demanding friendship.

One can remain politely distant and still reap the social capital benefits attributed to neighbor trust. The essence of harmonious neighbor relations lies in reciprocal respect personal space and shared norms rather than proximity of affection. Living beside each other without intrusion achieves the balance between privacy and communal care.

In conclusion it is neither necessary nor realistic to treat neighbors as best friends. Instead civility trust and courtesy suffice to build resilient community networks. Empirical evidence confirms that minimal contact such as greetings and occasional assistance fosters well being safety and social cohesion. Recognizing that proximity need not equal personal closeness clarifies the virtues of respectful neighborly distance. This stance embodies the wisdom that peace between homes depends on mutual respect not friendship.

Be the Energy You Want Around You: Personal Positivity as Catalyst for Neighborhood Social Capital

Human behavior often generates more neighborhood dynamics than formal policy ever could. By intentionally embodying positivity trust reciprocity and warmth one can reshape the social environment. This concept relies on the theory of social capital which emphasizes trust norms and networks as foundational to well being and collective resilience. When one neighbor radiates goodwill others reflect it enabling cooperative action informal guardianship and mental health improvements. Empirical evidence since 2020 underscores how individual energy shapes wider neighborhood outcomes.

Social capital theory suggests that positive social behavior builds trust networks and reciprocity which enhance collective cooperation (Social Capital Framework) ([turn0search10] ). These relationships become self reinforcing as trust begets more trust and reciprocity encourages further generosity. The local effect is that a small act like a friendly greeting causes others to reciprocate or pay it forward strengthening emotional climate. That ripple effect creates a community ethos of care rather than isolation.

Research from the Chinese General Social Survey demonstrates that social trust increases neighbor interactions reciprocity and reduces stress leading to better mental health among young adults (Song et al.). Social trust functions as a catalyst enabling neighbor encounters which mediate reductions in depressed mood through reciprocal help and lowered perceived work stress (Song et al.) ([turn0search15] ). This reveals that positive energy transforms neighbor contact from superficial to meaningful resource exchange.

Community resilience literature affirms that collective efficacy and social cohesion are cultivated through mutual neighbor engagement propelled by individual dispositions (Cosentino et al.). Feeling supported triggers prosocial norms and voluntary intervention for public good (Cosentino et al.) ([turn0search13] ). When someone embodies supportive presence the whole community gains capacity to act together in crises or shared endeavors.

A cross sectional study conducted in rural southwest Nigeria identified structural social capital such as trust and support networks as predictors of functional health status and quality of life (Okoroafor et al.). Those who perceived neighbor goodwill reported better subjective well being and resilience even under socio economic constraints. This further confirms that one person’s positive posture becomes a beacon that improves communal mental health and cohesion (Okoroafor et al.) ([turn0search5] ).

An additional case study on energy communities in Europe found that positive neighborly engagement directly influenced willingness to participate in joint initiatives. Communities characterized by high quality social interactions are more likely to sustain collective action (Sustainable Energy Communities) ([turn0search14] ). This illustrates how individual energy translates into organized cooperation impacting shared goals beyond daily kindness.

National public health reports such as Healthy People 2030 emphasize that social cohesion reduces mortality anxiety and loneliness by building trust shared norms and networks (CDC Social Cohesion Summary) ([turn0search11] ). These outcomes are not abstract but emerge from everyday exchanges shaped by attitude. A calm inviting neighbor amplifies these benefits.

Thus by choosing to be welcoming respectful reliable and constructive one contributes to civic psychological architecture. Each gesture of courtesy or assistance normalizes reciprocity and fortifies group bonds. Over time this energy creates collective efficacy a mutual belief in the ability to maintain community wellbeing informally. That belief supports informal public safety and mental health resources.

In conclusion to be the energy you want around you is to invest in social capital at the micro level. Positivity trust and reciprocity expressed in neighborly conduct propagate into communal norms that uphold cooperation safety and emotional resilience. Empirical research affirms that such personal dispositions convert to measurable improvements in mental health subjective well being and neighborhood performance. Your daily tone becomes the spark that lights communal goodwill. Living in harmony thus works better when you embody the atmosphere you hope to receive.

In conclusion, 

Cultivating Neighborly Harmony as Public Health Infrastructure

In summary the accumulated evidence since 2020 presents a compelling case that harmonious neighbor relations are far more than courteous etiquette. They represent foundational infrastructure for mental health, social well‑being, public safety, and resilience in the face of collective stress. Social cohesion trust reciprocity and mutual civic engagement transform neighborhoods into protective environments that reinforce both individual flourishing and communal vitality.

First the health literature demonstrates that neighborhood social cohesion directly reduces symptoms of depression anxiety and psychological distress across all age groups. Empirical studies show that when neighbours trust and support each other perceived stress declines and life satisfaction increases ([turn0search10]; [turn0search4]). Research further indicates that cohesion buffers the negative effects of adverse experiences in childhood and material poverty through mediators such as social support and trust ([turn0search4]). These pathways highlight that harmony cultivates conditions under which resilience may thrive and suffering may be prevented before clinical intervention becomes necessary.

The protective effects extend into physiological realms. Social connectedness influences formal immune regulation and inflammation responses. Feeling connected reduces inflammatory gene expression associated with chronic disease and loneliness whereas isolation up‑regulates stress pathways ([turn0search26]). Acts of kindness and neighborly generosity have measurable physiological benefits. In this sense neighborly harmony functions not simply as psychosocial balm but as biological regulation strategy.

Older adults provide one of the clearest test cases for how community cohesion matters. A large cross sectional study of community dwelling seniors in China reveals that higher cohesion corresponds to better self perceived health life satisfaction psychological resilience and reduced loneliness during the pandemic ([turn0search18]). Longitudinal evidence from New Zealand confirms that neighborhood cohesion in older people predicts decreased loneliness and improved mental health six years later via enhanced social support and engagement ([turn0search0]). These consistent patterns underscore that maintaining neighbor ties matters most when mobility decreases and traditional social networks may fade.

Equally compelling are the findings on social capital and antidepressant usage. A nationwide analysis linking antidepressant use to spatial social capital reveals that cohesive networks and local strong ties correlate with reduced probability of medication use ([turn0academia30]). Young people especially benefit from proximity cohesion and informal local interaction. When neighbors trust one another mental health care need declines even after accounting for healthcare access. Harmony at home thus emerges as a scalable preventive strategy.

Beyond mental health the evidence affirms that cohesion contributes directly to public security. High social trust and collective efficacy correlate with lower crime rates in urban neighbourhoods ([turn0search27]; [turn0search12]). When citizens feel aligned in shared norms and mutual monitoring informal guardianship reduces disorder even when structured activity diminishes. Safety arises not from surveillance but from neighborhoods infused with mutual respect and care.

Moreover cohesive neighbourhoods mitigate contextual stressors including income inequality and spatial disparities. Researchers in Canada document how economic disparity erodes trust and fuels loneliness when people feel poor relative to neighbours ([turn0news22]). This sense of relative deprivation undermines cohesion and mental health. Addressing economic inequities thus supports neighbor trust and communal solidarity. Suggesting that policy must integrate social and economic strategies.

Public health analysis supports this integrated approach. A new modelling study in Australia estimates that modest reductions in substance misuse or childhood adversity in socially vulnerable areas could save hundreds of millions in health costs over a decade ([turn0news20]). The study advocates for shifting from clinical treatments to upstream fixes targeting root social causes such as neighbourhood cohesion. Clinics alone cannot replace the stabilising infrastructure of neighbour trust.

Ecological and environmental design also reinforce these human dynamics. Urban green space mediates the relationship between social support cohesion and happiness in wealthy countries ([turn0academia29]). Community greening reduces violence improves mental health and fosters neighbourhood interaction ([turn0search33]). Features such as parks sidewalks benches and shared gardens lower barriers to casual interaction and normalize benevolence across property lines.

Walking initiatives and shared moving around the block play a surprisingly critical role. Studies suggest that neighbourhood walking creates opportunities for spontaneous neighbour engagement which builds trust and access to coping resources ([turn0search19]). Such informal gatherings strengthen social ties beyond the individual through shared experiential context.

The cumulative data point toward a clear conclusion. Living in harmony with immediate neighbours is neither trivial nor optional. It is evidence based public health policy. It builds social capital produces coherent support networks shapes civic engagement and regulates individual stress systems. Those benefits cascade across mental health, physical health, safety, and even economic well‑being.

Accordingly actionable recommendations must follow. Planners and public health authorities should prioritize neighbourly cohesion through multilevel strategies. Invest in shared public spaces encourage walking and community events enable social prescribing that links individuals to local groups clubs or volunteer initiatives. Support community greening programs that combine mental health outcomes with social interaction. Address inequality and spatial disparities to reinforce trust across diverse economic strata. When politicians ask what is the best public health investment remember that peace literally begins at the fence line.

In closing neighborly harmony is not sentimental folklore. It is scientific, empirical, and deeply pragmatic. Harmonious neighbourhoods heal faster, feel safer, and sustain hope. The choice to greet, help, and trust those just next door elevates not only the quality of individual life but also the capacity of entire communities to endure, flourish and belong. The empirical record is clear. Peace begins at home.

Works Cited

Cheng, Hongwei, et al. “The Relationship Between Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Mental Health During COVID-19: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.701887.

Choi, Hyungjin Myra, et al. “Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Mental Health: The Moderating Effect of Social Support.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 14, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147270.

Cosentino, Maya, et al. “Community-Based Resilience: The Influence of Collective Efficacy and Positive Deviance on Climate Change-Related Mental Health.” Storytelling to Accelerate Climate Solutions, 2024.

de Vries, Sanne, et al. “Green Space as a Buffer Between Stressful Life Events and Health.” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 281, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114093.

Dewilde, Caroline, and Koenraad Matthijs. “Neighbourhood Cohesion and Loneliness: A Longitudinal Study of Older Adults in New Zealand.” Health & Place, vol. 72, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102711.

Gao, Qi, et al. “The Relationship Between Relative Deprivation and Loneliness: The Mediating Role of Neighborhood Trust.” Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 51, no. 2, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22920.

Hu, Zhenke, et al. “The Impact of Neighborhood Social Cohesion on Depression Among Older Adults in China.” Aging & Mental Health, vol. 27, no. 1, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1926429.

Kawachi, Ichiro, and Lisa Berkman. “Social Capital, Collective Efficacy, and Community Resilience.” Social Epidemiology, Oxford UP, 2021.

Krieger, Nancy, et al. “Health Equity and Neighborhood Cohesion: A Systems-Based Perspective.” The Lancet Public Health, vol. 6, no. 2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30245-0.

Liu, Ming, et al. “Walking, Neighborhood Safety, and Social Cohesion: Findings From the PATH Study.” Health & Place, vol. 67, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102467.

Mackenzie, Callum, et al. “Preventing Mental Health Issues Through Upstream Investment: An Economic Case.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 58, no. 3, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674231161463.

Okoroafor, Promise Izuchukwu, et al. “Social Capital, Functional Health Status and Quality of Life Among Adults in Rural Southwest Nigeria.” BMC Public Health, vol. 25, article number 1317, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-14021-w.

Pitas, Nicholas A., and Elizabeth A. Ehmer. “Social Capital in the Response to COVID-19.” American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 35, no. 3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117121999292.

Putnam, Robert D. “Social Capital and Public Affairs.” The American Prospect, vol. 13, Spring 2020.

Song, Chi, et al. “How Social Trust and Neighbor Interactions Reduce Depressed Mood Among Young Adults.” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031034.

Wang, Li, et al. “Neighbourhood Greenness and Mental Health: Roles of Social Cohesion and Physical Activity.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 58, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126999.

Yang, Li, and Ping Sun. “Social Capital and Antidepressant Use: A National-Level Analysis in Europe.” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 285, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114303.