Can Relationships Survive Infidelity? A Path Toward Healing or a Road to Ruin

Infidelity shatters illusions faster than love letters burn. It is a brutal mirror that exposes every crack a couple refused to fix. While society chants “once a cheater always a cheater,” reality is not as binary. Some relationships disintegrate into bitter silence, while others crawl through the wreckage and rise anew. Surviving betrayal demands more than hollow apologies or social media therapy quotes. It requires a raw dismantling of ego, a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths, and a relentless pursuit of emotional accountability. The choice to stay or leave is never the scandal; the scandal lies in how people handle the aftermath.

Infidelity has been condemned, crucified, and canonized in the court of public opinion. Society loves to scream betrayal as if love itself is allergic to failure. Cheating is often packaged as the final straw, the ultimate proof that a relationship was a doomed fairy tale to begin with. Yet, beneath the noise of self-righteous indignation, the reality of infidelity is far messier and brutally human. People cheat. Not because they are always evil or unsatisfied, but because human relationships are fragile ecosystems fueled by emotions people barely understand. Betrayal is not always a premeditated act of war; sometimes, it is a symptom of unresolved emotional poverty simmering beneath picture-perfect facades.

The popular narrative insists that cheating is an automatic death sentence for relationships. But that is not the full story. Some couples, against all odds and common sense, choose to stay. Not out of desperation or blind forgiveness, but because betrayal sometimes forces a reckoning that comfort never will. These couples are not fools clinging to dead love; they are survivors navigating the brutal battlefield of emotional reconstruction. Infidelity becomes the ugly teacher that demands both partners confront their emotional laziness, communication dysfunctions, and the silent drift that often precedes betrayal.

But make no mistake, surviving infidelity is not a romantic miracle. It is an agonizingly raw process that shreds illusions, confronts egos, and forces a new language of emotional accountability. The affair is merely the detonator; the real damage depends on how both partners choose to respond when the dust settles. Rebuilding trust is not a feel-good montage of flowers and date nights; it is a relentless grind of radical honesty, uncomfortable conversations, and the brutal humility to admit personal failures.

However, not all relationships are designed to survive such devastation. Sometimes, the betrayal uncovers a rot too deep to cleanse. In such cases, walking away is not a defeat but an act of self-preservation. The real tragedy is not the cheating; it is the emotional negligence that allowed two people to drift into parallel lives while sharing the same bed.

Infidelity is not just a scandal. It is a crossroad where relationships are either reborn through intentional healing or buried under the weight of unresolved dysfunction. The path to survival is fragile, treacherous, and brutally honest, but for those who dare, it can lead to a level of intimacy no fairy tale romance ever promises.

Factors That Influence Relationship Recovery

Infidelity is not a one-size-fits-all catastrophe. The aftermath of betrayal plays out differently in every relationship, governed by a brutal combination of context, character, and emotional maturity. The survival of a relationship after infidelity hinges on more than just apologies. It demands a deep forensic audit of emotional dynamics, personal accountability, and the very fabric that once held two people together. Not every affair spells doom, but not every relationship deserves revival either.

One of the most critical determinants of recovery is the unfaithful partner’s immediate response after discovery. This is where the true character of a person surfaces. Genuine remorse is not a poetic apology; it is a behavioral shift that accepts responsibility without defensive maneuvers. When the betrayer reacts with denial, blame-shifting, or minimization of the affair’s impact, they dig the grave of the relationship deeper with every word (Gordon et al. 236). On the contrary, when the unfaithful partner demonstrates transparency, empathy, and a willingness to answer uncomfortable questions, the process of healing, though painful, becomes a possibility.

Yet, remorse from the offender is only one side of the coin. The betrayed partner’s emotional capacity for forgiveness becomes the defining pivot of whether the relationship limps back to life or collapses under resentment. Forgiveness is not a get-out-of-jail-free card; it is a conscious, grueling decision to release vengeful fantasies and redirect energy toward personal healing. However, forgiveness is not linear. It requires repeated validation of the betrayed partner’s pain, a safe space for emotional expression, and a brutal amount of patience from both parties (Worthington 383). Any attempt to rush forgiveness or dismiss the depth of emotional injury is not reconciliation; it is emotional gaslighting.

The nature of the affair itself is another factor that influences recovery trajectories. A one-night stand, though painful, is often seen as a lapse in judgment. On the other hand, a prolonged emotional or physical affair signifies a sustained pattern of deception, which corrodes trust at a molecular level (Blow and Hartnett 196). Emotional affairs, in particular, carry a unique sting because they signify a transfer of emotional intimacy, which is often the glue of any meaningful relationship. The length, secrecy, and emotional involvement in the affair shape the magnitude of emotional wounds and the complexity of the healing process.

Moreover, pre-existing emotional bonds before the affair play a vital role in post-infidelity recovery. Relationships built on a foundation of authentic emotional connection, mutual respect, and shared vulnerability have a higher chance of survival because there is an existing emotional reservoir to draw from. Conversely, relationships that were already suffering from emotional neglect, unresolved resentment, or superficial intimacy often find that infidelity is the final blow, not the first crack.

Lastly, societal perceptions and external pressures also influence the recovery narrative. In a world obsessed with image management, some couples attempt to salvage appearances rather than address underlying issues. They wear forgiveness as a social mask while silently hemorrhaging inside. This performative reconciliation is a ticking time bomb. True recovery demands an inward focus, where the couple chooses emotional authenticity over public perception, even if it means walking away.

Surviving infidelity is not a product of luck or wishful thinking. It is the result of emotional labor, brutal honesty, and a relentless commitment to either rebuild a new relationship from the ashes or accept the uncomfortable truth that some fractures are beyond repair. The factors that influence recovery are not abstract concepts; they are lived experiences that test the very core of human resilience.

The Role of Therapy and Professional Guidance

Infidelity is emotional warfare. It detonates trust, obliterates security, and leaves partners fumbling through the wreckage of their relationship, often with no roadmap to healing. In the aftermath of betrayal, raw emotions and unfiltered reactions tend to dominate the narrative. This is where professional therapy ceases to be an optional luxury and becomes an indispensable necessity. Therapy is not a soft couch and kind words; it is a surgical intervention that forces both partners to confront their emotional scars with clinical precision.

Couples therapy provides a neutral battlefield where emotional weapons are checked at the door. It offers a structured environment where both partners are compelled to articulate their feelings, grievances, and unmet needs without resorting to the toxic blame games that often hijack personal attempts at reconciliation (Olmstead et al. 105). A professional therapist does not take sides; they expose the emotional dysfunctions, communication breakdowns, and unmet emotional needs that may have contributed to the betrayal. Therapy is not about excusing the affair but understanding the emotional context that allowed such a rupture to occur.

One of the most effective therapeutic approaches in post-infidelity recovery is Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT). This model shifts the focus from behavioral blame to emotional responsiveness. EFT dismantles the defensive walls partners build and fosters emotional attunement, allowing them to recognize and respond to each other’s emotional vulnerabilities (Johnson and Greenman 106). EFT is not a magic potion that erases the affair, but it equips couples with the emotional tools to rebuild secure attachment bonds that infidelity had previously obliterated.

However, not all healing happens in a couple’s session. For the betrayed partner, the emotional impact of infidelity often manifests with trauma-like symptoms, including intrusive thoughts, emotional numbing, and severe self-esteem erosion. In such cases, individual therapy becomes a critical component of the recovery process. Therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) provide structured approaches for the betrayed partner to process the emotional fallout, reframe cognitive distortions, and rebuild a fractured sense of self (Gordon et al. 238). Recovery is not just about saving the relationship; it is about salvaging personal emotional well-being.

The unfaithful partner, too, is not spared from individual introspection. Therapy forces the betrayer to confront the deeper motivations behind their actions. Affairs are rarely just about lust; they are often symptomatic of unaddressed emotional dissatisfaction, unresolved personal insecurities, or dysfunctional coping mechanisms. Individual therapy helps the betrayer dissect these underlying issues, fostering genuine self-awareness and preventing a relapse into self-sabotaging behaviors.

Professional guidance also serves as a reality check. Not every relationship deserves to be salvaged. Therapists are trained to identify toxic patterns, chronic emotional abuse, and personality disorders that make reconciliation a futile endeavor. In such cases, therapy transitions from relationship repair to emotional exit strategies, ensuring both partners prioritize their long-term mental health over societal expectations of coupledom.

Additionally, therapy introduces couples to the concept of relational accountability. It moves beyond the simplistic narrative of victim and villain and challenges both partners to assume responsibility for their emotional contributions, or lack thereof, to the relationship dynamic. Infidelity might be a singular act of betrayal, but relationship dysfunctions are rarely a solo performance.

In a society that glorifies self-help books and quick-fix advice, professional therapy stands as an uncomfortable truth: healing is hard, messy, and demands guided introspection. The road from betrayal to recovery is littered with emotional landmines, and attempting to navigate it without professional guidance is not bravery; it is reckless emotional endangerment.

Rebuilding Trust and Setting New Boundaries

Trust is the currency of intimate relationships. When infidelity occurs, that currency is rendered worthless, and rebuilding its value is neither automatic nor guaranteed. Contrary to fairy tale reconciliations, trust does not regenerate through apologies or empty promises. It demands an excruciatingly deliberate process of behavioral consistency, emotional transparency, and the establishment of boundaries that are not negotiable. The idea that time heals all wounds is a myth. Time merely passes. It is what both partners do with that time that determines whether trust is resurrected or buried.

The unfaithful partner carries the primary responsibility for initiating trust reconstruction. This process is not about grand gestures or public declarations of loyalty. It is about sustained, transparent actions that rebuild emotional safety brick by brick. Radical honesty becomes the new operating system. The betrayer must be willing to answer uncomfortable questions, provide access to communication devices, and maintain full transparency regarding their whereabouts and interactions (Olmstead et al. 108). This level of openness is not about control; it is about demonstrating reliability through consistent behaviors that counteract the secrecy which facilitated the betrayal in the first place.

However, transparency without emotional attunement is insufficient. The betrayed partner’s emotional triggers become unpredictable landmines, and the unfaithful partner must develop the emotional intelligence to navigate them with empathy rather than defensiveness. Every flashback, every question, and every emotional breakdown is not an attack but a symptom of a shattered trust system. Responding to these moments with patience, rather than frustration, becomes a critical pillar in rebuilding relational security.

Establishing new boundaries is equally vital. These are not arbitrary rules designed to suffocate freedom. They are the emotional fences that protect the relationship’s fragile recovery phase. Boundaries must be co-created, explicitly stated, and mutually respected. They can range from redefining acceptable interactions with the opposite sex to clarifying expectations around digital communication and social media engagement. What matters is not the content of the boundaries but the intention behind them: to cultivate an environment where emotional safety is prioritized over personal convenience.

Boundaries also force couples to confront their vulnerabilities head-on. Infidelity exposes the weak spots in a relationship’s infrastructure, whether it is emotional neglect, poor communication, or unresolved past wounds. New boundaries should be designed to address these specific vulnerabilities rather than serving as generalized moral codes. For instance, if emotional distance was a precursor to the affair, a boundary around regular emotional check-ins becomes a non-negotiable commitment.

It is important to recognize that boundaries are not static. They require ongoing reassessment and renegotiation as the relationship evolves. This dynamic process demands a level of emotional maturity that transcends mere compliance. Both partners must be willing to engage in uncomfortable conversations, recalibrate expectations, and adapt their relational practices as trust is gradually restored.

Furthermore, the betrayed partner must also set internal boundaries. These are psychological commitments to personal healing, self-respect, and emotional clarity. Rebuilding trust is not synonymous with tolerating emotional neglect or repeated betrayals. The betrayed partner must develop the discernment to differentiate between genuine efforts at reconciliation and performative apologies that lack substantive behavioral change.

Rebuilding trust after infidelity is not a feel-good redemption arc. It is a brutal, often thankless process that tests the emotional resilience of both partners. The affair is not the only betrayal at play; complacency, neglect, and emotional cowardice often lurk in the relationship’s history. Trust is not rebuilt through time. It is rebuilt through relentless emotional labor, radical honesty, and boundaries that are fiercely protected. Without these pillars, the relationship becomes a performance of reconciliation rather than a lived reality of restored intimacy.

When Walking Away Is the Healthier Choice

Not every relationship deserves a second chance. The popular narrative that love can conquer all, including infidelity, is a dangerous myth that traps countless individuals in emotional quicksand. Sometimes, walking away is not an act of giving up; it is an act of reclaiming self-respect and emotional sanity. The choice to leave after betrayal is often painted as weakness or failure, but in reality, it is a brutally courageous decision that many are too scared to make.

Infidelity often acts as a magnifying glass, exposing pre-existing relational fractures that have been ignored, minimized, or romantically rationalized. Chronic emotional neglect, unresolved resentment, and deep-seated incompatibilities do not magically disappear with apologies. When an affair unveils these underlying dysfunctions, reconciliation efforts become a futile exercise in emotional self-deception. Attempting to salvage a relationship drowning in systemic emotional poverty is not noble; it is self-destructive (Atkins et al. 746).

The betraying partner’s response to the affair’s exposure is a critical determinant of whether walking away becomes the healthier choice. Genuine remorse is not a one-time performance; it is a sustained commitment to transparency, emotional labor, and personal transformation. When the unfaithful partner minimizes the affair, shifts blame, or exhibits defensive posturing, the betrayal is not an isolated event, it becomes a pattern of emotional manipulation (Gordon et al. 239). Staying in such a dynamic is not an act of forgiveness; it is emotional masochism dressed in the language of loyalty.

Repeated infidelity is another glaring red flag that signals the need to exit. Serial betrayal is not a series of unfortunate mistakes; it is a character flaw deeply entrenched in entitlement, emotional immaturity, or narcissistic tendencies. No amount of therapy or relationship boot camps can fix a partner who is committed to their self-serving desires at the expense of mutual respect. Remaining in such relationships under the illusion of potential change often results in prolonged emotional harm, eroded self-worth, and psychological trauma (Blow and Hartnett 198).

Furthermore, the social pressure to “fight for love” often traps individuals in toxic cycles. Society romanticizes endurance but rarely interrogates the quality of what is being endured. Emotional abuse, gaslighting, and continuous breaches of trust should never be rebranded as relationship challenges. Walking away becomes an act of emotional self-defense, a refusal to be a martyr for a relationship that only thrives on one-sided emotional labor.

There are also situations where the betrayed partner’s emotional boundaries are irrevocably shattered. Trust, once broken, cannot always be reconstructed, no matter how sincere the apologies or intensive the therapy. The psychological toll of living in perpetual suspicion, emotional hypervigilance, and unresolved pain becomes a slow erosion of one’s mental health. In such cases, staying becomes a prison sentence where love turns into a daily negotiation of emotional survival.

Walking away is not a failure of love. It is a recognition that love alone is insufficient when respect, trust, and emotional safety have been compromised beyond repair. The courage to leave is often met with external judgment, but the real tragedy lies in staying out of fear, guilt, or societal expectations. A relationship that requires the betrayal of one’s self-worth to survive is already dead.

Infidelity forces a crossroads. While some paths lead to emotional reconstruction, others demand a decisive exit for personal healing. The healthiest choice is not dictated by romantic ideals or public opinion. It is dictated by the reality of the emotional environment one chooses to inhabit. Walking away, when necessary, is not the end of love; it is the beginning of self-respect.

Post-Traumatic Growth: Emerging Stronger After Betrayal

Infidelity is often seen as a relationship’s death sentence. However, in rare and brutally honest cases, it becomes the catalyst for transformation. This is not a redemption story for the faint-hearted. Post-traumatic growth after betrayal is not a poetic narrative of forgiveness; it is a raw, uncomfortable process of deconstructing emotional illusions, dismantling dysfunctional patterns, and rebuilding a relationship from its exposed, bleeding core. Couples who navigate this journey do not emerge unscarred. They emerge wiser, more self-aware, and bound by a depth of intimacy that no fairytale romance could manufacture.

Post-traumatic growth is not the same as sweeping infidelity under the rug. It demands that both partners confront the affair not as an isolated incident but as a symptom of deeper relational fractures. For couples who dare to face this emotional reckoning, the betrayal becomes a mirror reflecting their complacency, emotional neglect, and unspoken grievances. This confrontation is neither polite nor comfortable. It is emotionally surgical, cutting through layers of denial and forcing a mutual commitment to authentic change (Olmstead et al. 110).

The process begins with radical emotional transparency. Both partners must abandon their curated versions of the relationship and dive into the messy truth of who they have become. The betrayed partner is given space to articulate their pain without being silenced by defensiveness or guilt-tripping from the betrayer. Conversely, the unfaithful partner must excavate the emotional voids, insecurities, or unmet needs that led them to breach trust in the first place. This is not about excusing the affair; it is about dismantling the emotional landscapes that made betrayal a feasible choice (Gordon et al. 240).

Couples who achieve post-traumatic growth often report a seismic shift in their communication dynamics. The affair forces them to discard superficial conversations and adopt a language of emotional vulnerability. This newfound emotional fluency becomes the foundation for a deeper bond, where both partners learn to express needs, fears, and desires without resorting to passive aggression or emotional withdrawal. Improved communication is not a side effect of time passing; it is the result of deliberate, often painful, emotional labor (Johnson and Greenman 107).

Another hallmark of post-traumatic growth is the redefinition of relationship roles. Infidelity shatters traditional power dynamics, forcing partners to renegotiate how they relate to each other. The betrayal becomes a reset button, enabling couples to rebuild their relationship with a focus on mutual emotional accountability rather than outdated roles of victim and villain. This process involves establishing new boundaries, recalibrating emotional expectations, and creating rituals of connection that prioritize emotional presence over performative gestures.

However, post-traumatic growth is not guaranteed. It is contingent on both partners’ willingness to endure discomfort, embrace vulnerability, and commit to an ongoing process of emotional evolution. Many couples fail because they seek shortcuts, hoping that time, distractions, or empty apologies will suffice. Growth after betrayal is not a natural progression; it is an intentional, grueling choice made daily.

For couples who persevere, the reward is a relationship forged through emotional fire. They develop a resilience that is not based on blind trust but on transparent, lived experiences of confronting and surviving emotional devastation together. Their intimacy is no longer based on romantic assumptions but on earned emotional safety.

Infidelity, while devastating, does not have to be the final chapter. For those who dare to face its aftermath with brutal honesty and relentless emotional labor, it becomes the beginning of a relationship that is no longer built on illusions but on hard-earned authenticity. Post-traumatic growth is not a fairytale ending. It is a raw, unfiltered rebirth.

In conclusion,

A Fragile Yet Possible Path to Healing

Infidelity shatters relationships in a way few other betrayals can. It is not just the act of physical disloyalty that devastates; it is the emotional aftermath, the broken trust, the dismantled sense of safety, and the brutal realization that love alone is never enough. Yet, the story of infidelity does not have to be an automatic obituary for relationships. Some couples do survive. Some couples claw their way through the wreckage and emerge not as they were before, but as something entirely different that is raw, exposed, but deeply connected in a way that only survivors of emotional warfare can understand.

But let us be very clear: survival after infidelity is neither romantic nor inevitable. It is a path paved with relentless emotional labor, radical honesty, and a complete rejection of the fairy tale belief that time will heal all wounds. Time is indifferent. It is what couples do within that time that decides whether they will heal or merely coexist in a charade of reconciliation.

One of the first brutal truths couples must accept is that infidelity is rarely the root problem. It is the symptom. The affair exposes vulnerabilities that were already festering beneath the surface. Emotional neglect, communication breakdowns, unresolved personal insecurities, or a growing emotional chasm that neither partner dared to confront. When couples approach infidelity recovery by focusing solely on the affair, they perform emotional triage without addressing the underlying disease. This approach guarantees a relapse, whether in the form of another affair or a slow emotional death where both partners coexist as strangers (Gordon et al. 236).

True recovery demands a forensic audit of the relationship’s emotional infrastructure. Both partners must dissect how they arrived at a point where betrayal became a plausible outcome. This process is not about assigning blame but about uncovering the emotional patterns that normalized distance, resentment, and unmet needs. It requires the unfaithful partner to own their choices without justifying them through relational deficits, while the betrayed partner must confront whether they were emotionally disengaged or unaware of growing relational fractures. This level of introspection is not comfortable, but it is non-negotiable.

Professional guidance, especially through couples therapy, becomes a lifeline in this phase. Therapists act as emotional architects, helping couples reconstruct communication channels, rebuild emotional safety, and establish new relational frameworks that are immune to the dysfunctions that previously defined their dynamic (Olmstead et al. 105). Therapeutic approaches like Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) provide couples with a structured method to reforge their emotional bonds, fostering a level of emotional attunement that transcends surface-level apologies (Johnson and Greenman 106).

However, the survival of a relationship post-infidelity is not solely determined by external interventions. It hinges on the internal commitment of both partners to embrace discomfort, emotional vulnerability, and sustained behavioral change. The unfaithful partner must be willing to live in a state of radical transparency, where their actions, intentions, and emotions are open to scrutiny without the defensiveness that previously fueled secrecy. Transparency is not a temporary performance but a permanent lifestyle shift. The betrayed partner, on the other hand, must navigate the labyrinth of emotional triggers, learning to express their pain without weaponizing it, while also committing to a long-term process of forgiveness that is layered, nonlinear, and deeply personal (Worthington 383).

Rebuilding trust is not about restoring the old relationship. That relationship is dead. What couples build in the aftermath is an entirely new relational entity, constructed on the ashes of the old, but rooted in a deeper emotional reality. This requires both partners to establish new boundaries that reflect their current emotional needs and vulnerabilities. Boundaries are not punitive measures; they are the emotional fences that safeguard intimacy and protect against the relational neglect that often precedes betrayal (Olmstead et al. 108).

Yet, not all relationships are meant to survive infidelity. Some fractures reveal irreconcilable differences, chronic emotional abuse, or patterns of manipulation that no amount of therapy can fix. In such cases, walking away is not an admission of failure; it is an act of emotional self-preservation. Staying in a relationship where trust cannot be restored, where the betrayer exhibits no genuine remorse, or where emotional safety remains compromised is not an act of strength. It is emotional martyrdom. The healthiest choice is often the most difficult one: choosing to leave for the sake of one’s mental and emotional well-being (Atkins et al. 746).

For the couples who do survive, however, infidelity can become a paradoxical turning point. Post-traumatic growth is not a myth, but it is rare and excruciatingly earned. It requires a complete dismantling of relational patterns, a willingness to confront emotional truths without sugarcoating, and a daily commitment to choose the relationship with full awareness of its fragility. These couples often emerge with a depth of intimacy that is forged not in romantic bliss but in the shared experience of surviving emotional devastation together (Olmstead et al. 110).

They learn to communicate with brutal honesty, to express needs before they metastasize into resentment, and to prioritize emotional presence over performative gestures. Their relationship is no longer built on assumptions of loyalty but on deliberate acts of emotional accountability. This transformation is not born out of the affair itself, but from the relentless work that follows. The betrayal becomes a catalyst for a deeper emotional awakening, forcing both partners to become better versions of themselves, not just for the relationship, but for their own personal growth.

Infidelity recovery is a crucible. It burns away illusions, tests emotional endurance, and leaves no space for half-hearted efforts. Those who survive it do not do so by accident. They survive because they chose, every single day, to confront discomfort, to communicate vulnerably, and to commit to the slow, grueling process of rebuilding a relationship that is no longer bound by romantic fantasies but by lived, earned emotional truths.

In the end, whether a relationship survives infidelity is not determined by the betrayal itself. It is determined by how both partners respond to the betrayal. Survival is possible, but it is fragile, conditional, and demands a level of emotional labor that many are unwilling to invest. For those who do, however, the reward is a relationship that is not defined by its past wounds but by its resilience, authenticity, and an intimacy that has been battle-tested and proven unbreakable.

Works Cited

Atkins, David C., et al. “Understanding Infidelity: Correlates in a National Random Sample.” Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, 2001, pp. 735-749. APA PsycNet, https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.735.

Blow, Adrian J., and Kelley Hartnett. “Infidelity in Committed Relationships II: A Substantive Review.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 31, no. 2, 2005, pp. 193-208. Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01556.x.

Gordon, Kristina C., et al. “Infidelity: Causes, Consequences, and Cures.” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 60, no. 11, 2004, pp. 233-241. Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20079.

Johnson, Susan M., and Paul S. Greenman. “Commentary: The Path to a Secure Bond: Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy.” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 62, no. 5, 2006, pp. 597-609. Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20253.

Olmstead, Spencer B., et al. “Couples’ Experiences with Post-Infidelity Relationship Recovery: A Phenomenological Study.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 35, no. 3, 2009, pp. 99-113. Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00106.x.

Worthington, Everett L. “Forgiveness in the Context of Couples’ Therapy.” Journal of Family Psychotherapy, vol. 15, no. 1-2, 2004, pp. 365-393. Taylor & Francis Online, https://doi.org/10.1300/J085v15n01_19.